Course Description — 2012/2013 Academic Year
The project course will provide experience in carrying out a significant project from conception to completion with minimal supervision and assistance. Frequently, the project is comprised of the design, implementation and documentation of a significant software or hardware system, but theoretical investigations or survey papers are equally valid. Other project ideas which do not fall into any of these categories are also possible. Students select projects after talking to a potential supervisor. The conduct, requirements and evaluation of each project lie solely in the hands of the faculty member who supervises the project. The faculty member and the student should agree on an appropriate scope of work before the project begins; for example, the design component of a particular software project could be so large that there will be no implementation requirement.
12h computer science at the 3000 or 4000 level, each with C-or better.
Individual projects are likely to require additional prior knowledge. For prerequisites of individual projects, students should consult the faculty member offering to supervise the project.
Project Topics: Students may select any project from the list of topics offered by individual faculty members. The list of topics may be obtained from the school web site. Students may also propose project ideas of their choice to faculty members.
Supervisors: Students may select any faculty member to be their supervisor, provided that the faculty member is willing to supervise the student to work on the selected topic.
Course Registration: In order to register for the course, you must first meet with the course coordinator (Dr. Giles). After this meeting Dr. Giles will notify Ms. Watson who can then help you to register for the course. Before you meet with Dr. Giles you should have read and understood this document!
Project Registration: After students have selected a topic and a supervisor for their project, students should complete a Project Registration Form. This is not the same as registering for the course through the Registrar! You must do both.
Conduct of Work: Unless stated otherwise by the supervisor, all project work must be done independently by individual students. Students may discuss their project with other people, but are solely responsible for the design and implementation of their project (in the case of software or hardware projects) and for the documentation, ideas and/or compilation of information in their project. Students are directed to the Academic Integrity section of the Acadia University Calendar. A student found to be cheating on any work will receive a course grade that is at most 70% (B-). Additionally, all instances of cheating will be reported to the Director of the School and to the University Registrar.
Late Rules: Work submitted after the required date is penalized at a rate chosen by the supervisor, who may also refuse to mark work submitted after a certain date. In any case, no work will be accepted after the last day of classes in Winter 2008.
The project deliverables include a formal, written report. As determined by the supervisor, deliverables may also include any or all of the following:
Dates, details and value of all required work will be determined by the supervisor. A sample is given below.
Students are evaluated as specified by the project supervisor. Since the supervisor is normally the only one responsible for the mark given to the student, students must consult individual supervisors for details.
The supervisor may give the student a statement of the precise requirements for the project. Alternatively a requirements document may be one of the first deliverables; this document would represent an agreement between the student and the supervisor as to what the rest of the project shall comprise.
At the end of this course outline is a suggested organization for the project report, which may be modified in accordance with the supervisor's directions. Depending on the type of project chosen, it may be important to include examples that demonstrate the effectiveness of the solution. These examples should be chosen and explained carefully.
Good projects require students to display significant individual initiative. Much of the work must be done individually, without any day to day supervision.
Students are responsible for ensuring that their work is received in time. All work submitted should be clearly marked with the student’s name, student number, and the number of the course (COMP 4983). Students should find out from their supervisors in what form work should be submitted: in printed form, on CD, via e-mail, or any combination thereof.
When writing a copy of project materials on a CD (or delivering them through other means), students must take care to agree with their supervisor on the format in which the files will be written. Files that can only be read by proprietary software are less portable and less desirable than files that can be read on a wide variety of systems. The supervisor may sometimes prefer the student to provide an additional plain text copy of such files.
All work submitted must be legible and tidy. If something is too difficult to read it may not be marked. Students should pay attention to the quality of all written work, since marks may be deducted for flaws such as bad grammar and incorrect spelling. (Note that many programs to check spelling are available; students should make use of one.) Unless the supervisor indicates otherwise, students may have other people proof-read their writing, but students must not have anyone else do any of the actual writing.
Students should choose their project early and start work on it as soon as possible. Experience has shown that many students cannot complete their projects in one semester.
Here is one suggestion (made by Dr. Oliver) for a schedule (two-term version) and marking scheme for the project. The supervisor for a given project may use a schedule and marking scheme considerably different than these.
Schedule:
| September | 1. Preliminary written scope of the project |
| October | 2. Final statement of scope of project |
| November | 3. Functional specification |
| January | 4. Detailed design |
| March | 5. Draft report |
| Last Day of Classes | 6. Final report and project delivery |
Marking scheme:
| 20% | Items 1 to 5 (above) |
| 20% | The final written report |
| 60% | Difficulty of the problem solved and quality of the solution |
Students intending to complete a project in one term should keep in mind that the schedule for such projects is considerably more compressed than the one above. As a very rough guide, students intending to finish a project in one term probably should have the final scope and functional specification finished by the end of the first month and the detailed design completed by the middle of the second month.
Students who would like to finish the project in one term should give serious thought to getting the project topic decided upon well in advance of the term.
Here is one possible organization for the project report (also suggested by Dr. Oliver). It may be modified in accordance with the supervisor’s directions. For example, a project which does not involve an implementation will probably not have an implementation description, a list of files, nor a source listing.
| Abstract | i | |
| Table of Contents | ii | |
| Section 1 | Introduction | 1 |
| Section 2 | Literature Review | 3 |
| Section 3 | Problem Description | 6 |
| Section 4 | Solution Description | 9 |
| Section 5 | Implementation Description | 12 |
| Section 6 | Possible Extensions | 16 |
| Section 7 | Summary and Conclusions | 18 |
| Section 8 | References and Bibliography | 19 |
| Appendix A | List of Files | 23 |
| Appendix B | User Manual | 24 |
| Appendix C | Source Listing | 31 |
Abstract: This should be a summary of the report, 150–250 words in length, on a separate page. It gives an overview of the problem and the solution (if appropriate).
Introduction: This should be a more detailed statement of the purpose of the project. In the case of an implementation project or theoretical investigation, it would provide an in-depth description of the problem and also outline the rest of the document. It should state why the problem or subject is important or interesting and how the solution method (if appropriate) will be used.
Formatting Considerations:
Copies:
Prepared by R. Giles - Last updated N/A